Skip to content

Kling 3.0 vs Wan 3.0 Video

Kling 3.0: Character-led scenes and UGC-style clips. Wan 3.0 Video: Polished 1080p clips where quality matters more than price.

Price verdict: Kling 3.0 is ~9% cheaper

Kling 3.0: $0.565 per second of video; Wan 3.0 Video: $0.62 per second of video. Indicative rates on TokPort. Compare the specs below alongside price.

Side by side

SpecKling 3.0Wan 3.0 Video
Price$0.565 per second of video$0.62 per second of video
Resolution720p (16:9)1080p, 30 fps (16:9)
Clip length3–15 s4–15 s
Typical latency≈3.5 min≈2 min
StrengthsHuman motion, Faces, Physics1080p, Prompt adherence
Best forCharacter-led scenes and UGC-style clips.Polished 1080p clips where quality matters more than price.

Choose Kling 3.0 if…

Character-led scenes and UGC-style clips.

  • Text-to-video
  • Image-to-video
  • Billed per second of output

$0.565 / second

Kling 3.0 details →

Choose Wan 3.0 Video if…

Polished 1080p clips where quality matters more than price.

  • Text-to-video
  • Billed per second of output

$0.62 / second

Wan 3.0 Video details →

Kling 3.0 vs Wan 3.0 Video FAQ

Is Kling 3.0 or Wan 3.0 Video cheaper?

Kling 3.0 is ~9% cheaper. Kling 3.0: $0.565 per second of video; Wan 3.0 Video: $0.62 per second of video.

Which should I choose, Kling 3.0 or Wan 3.0 Video?

Pick Kling 3.0 when unit cost drives the decision. Choose based on the strengths that match your brief: Human motion/Faces/Physics for Kling 3.0, 1080p/Prompt adherence for Wan 3.0 Video.

How do I switch between these models?

Set the "model" parameter to "kling-3-0" or "wan3-video". Check each model’s API reference for supported inputs and output settings before switching.

What does a month of heavy use cost for each?

At 10,000 seconds of video per month: Kling 3.0 costs $5650 and Wan 3.0 Video costs $6200 on our rates. Use the cost calculator for your exact volume.

Run both against your own prompts

Benchmark with your data, not ours. Create an account and run the same prompt on both models — or price your volume first.

Other comparisons